BENEFITS OF BECOMING A GS JOURNAL MEMBER LEARN MORE
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident: Arthur Schopenhauer -- In questions of science the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual: Galileo Galilei -- Science is a wonderful thing if one does not have to earn one's living at it: Albert Einstein -- When you have eliminated the impossible, what ever remains, however improbable must be the truth: Sir Arthur Conan Doyle -- We all agree that your theory is crazy, but is it crazy enough? Niels Bohr -- Whenever a true theory appears, it will be its own evidence. Its test is that it will explain all phenomena: Ralph Waldo Emerson -- Since the mathematicians invaded Relativity, I do not understand it myself anymore: Albert Einstein -- I would say that the aether is a medium invented by man for the purpose of propagating his misconceptions from one place to another: W.F.G. Swann: -- Most of the fundamental ideas of science are essentially simple, and may, as a rule, be expressed in a language comprehensible to everyone: Albert Einstein -- Physics is mathematical not because we know so much about the physical world, but because we know so little: Bertrand Russell -- If I could explain it to the average person, I would not have been worth the Nobel Prize: R. P. Feynman -- I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use: Galileo Galilei -- How dare we speak of the laws of chance? Is not chance the antithesis of all law?: Bertrand Russell -- Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I´m not sure about the former: Albert Einstein -- The glory of mathematics is that you don't have to say what you are talking about: Richard Feynman -- Anything is possible if you don´t know what you are talking about: Author Unknown -- In life, everything is relative - except Einstein´s theory: Leonid S. Sukhorukov -- Don´\'t worry about people stealing your ideas. If your ideas are any good, you´ll have to ram them down people´s throats: Howard Aiken --A day will come undoubtedly when the ether will be discarded as useless: H. Poincaré -- First they tell you you´re wrong and they can prove it; then they tell you you´re right but it isn´t important; then they tell you it´s important but they knew it all along: Charles Kettering -- It is not once nor twice but times without number that the same ideas make their appearance in the world: Aristotle -- The opposite of a true statement is a false statement. The opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth: Niels Bohr -- A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it: Max Planck -- Euclid taught me that without assumptions there is no proof. Therefore, in any argument, examine the assumptions: Eric Temple Bell -- Half this game is ninety percent mental: Yogi Berra

An Alternative Perspective to Our Understanding of Space and Planck’s Quanta

Author:

Hoffman, Kenneth Paul

Category:

Research Papers

Sub-Category:

Cosmology

Language:

English

Date Published:

September 4, 2017

Downloads:

824

Keywords:

Light, Quanta, Fields, Planck, Quantum Theory, Quantum Mechanics, Double Slit Experiment, Einstein, Schrodinger, Energy, Heat Transfer, Space, Cosmic Inflation, Gravity, Dark Matter, Dark Energy, aether

Abstract:

This paper is to provide a physical explanation for why energy is held to the quantum rule and what derives from that. Physics has been at an impasse for decades because of the inability to reconcile the QFT with GR. A mathematical model applied to the alternative approach presented here could help resolve that problem. "A 'Fusion' of the Wave and Particle Concepts", words from the book on "Einstein and the Quantum" by A. Douglas Stone, points out that Einstein believed that there needed to be some “fusion” in quantum theory to arrive at some deeper level of understanding of the quanta phenomenon that exists between matter and waves. “In 1954, a year before his death …Einstein wrote…to de Broglie…"Indeed, exactly like you, I am convinced that one must look for a substructure, a necessity that the present quantum theory hides.” E. Schrodinger said; "What we observe as material bodies and forces are nothing but shapes and variations in the structure of space". This paper gives support to those perspectives. It claims there is fundamental connection between space and matter that ties them together as two sides of one system and the quanta of energy is a fundamental part of that connection. That connection gives a new perspective on Space, Cosmic Inflation, Planck's Quanta, the nature of light, the flow of energy, the physical understanding to the Second Law of Thermodynamics, Relativity, and the fundamental forces, including gravity.

Comments

Ken Hoffman(United States):
Light is massless but it is objects with mass that will find relative speeds compared to other objects with mass. The exemption only appears to apply to 'c' when it is being measured for any observer in his own Inertial Reference Frame (IRF), as he is not accelerating, not in a gravitational field, not changing his speed or his direction. He cannot ever know his speed or even if he is not moving as that is all part of relativity. Thus, as per Maxwell equations, he will always find, under those conditions, that light speed is 'c' in his IRF. Any attempt to make a judgement of speed or time when observing another IRF will lead to an error if he assumes incorrectly that (1) he knows the absolute speed of that IRF, (2) light speed must be 'c' and (3) that time must change.

Posted: December 14, 2023 @ 5:29:30 am
Radu Baltag(Yachimata, Japan):
Q. Why is ‘c’ a constant regardless of the observer’s position and velocity?
A. If 'c' carry information, the observer’s position and velocity don't matter.

Q. Why it is a truth that light should have the exemption of needing a frame of reference in regards to its velocity ?
A. You can see and read it (the information) projected on a screen. The screen is the frame. So, we have an exemption of needing a frame.

The support of the information (the movie) carried by the light on the screen (the frame) is the 'c' constant v=c.
When you watch a film (movie) on a screen, the speed of the light projected on the screen v=c is constant, but the information conveyed (action, music, images, reflection, etc.) on the film has a variable speed.

And the light shineth in darkness...

1. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
2. The same was in the beginning with God.
3. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
4. In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
5. And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.

Posted: November 17, 2023 @ 10:00:23 pm
2 Replies

reply
Ken(United States):
Light is massless but it is objects with mass that will find relative speeds compared to other objects with mass. The exemption only appears to apply to 'c' when it is being measured for any observer in his own Inertial Reference Frame (IRF), as he is not accelerating, not in a gravitational field, not changing his speed or his direction. He cannot ever know his speed or even if he is not moving as that is all part of relativity. Thus, as per Maxwell equations, he will always find, under those conditions, that light speed is 'c' in his IRF. Any attempt to make a judgement of speed or time when observing another IRF will lead to an error if he assumes incorrectly that (1) he knows the absolute speed of that IRF, (2) light speed must be 'c' and (3) that time must change.

Posted: December 14, 2023 @ 5:27:33 am

reply
Ken Hoffman:
Light is massless but it is objects with mass that will find relative speeds compared to other objects with mass. The exemption only appears to apply to 'c' when it is being measured for any observer in his own Inertial Reference Frame (IRF), as he is not accelerating, not in a gravitational field, not changing his speed or his direction. He cannot ever know his speed or even if he is not moving as that is all part of relativity. Thus, as per Maxwell equations, he will always find, under those conditions, that light speed is 'c' in his IRF. Any attempt to make a judgement of speed or time when observing another IRF will lead to an error if he assumes incorrectly that (1) he knows the absolute speed of that IRF, (2) light speed must be 'c' and (3) that time must change.

Posted: December 14, 2023 @ 5:30:30 am

Add a Comment


<<< Back