Author:
Al Khawaja, Sameer
Date Published:
October 30, 2025
Keywords:
Simulation argument, Digital reality, Godel's incompleteness, Ontology
Abstract:
This article examines the simulation hypothesis through a formal epistemic and axiomatic lens, assessing whether it can constitute a coherent and testable account of cosmological reality. After outlining the conceptual claim that our universe might be a high-level computational construct, the paper develops a minimal axiomatic framework for a “simulation matrix” and evaluates its logical status. It is shown that the hypothesis is internally consistent yet inherently incomplete, in the Gödelian sense that no observer embedded within the simulated domain can obtain evidential access to the ontological ground of its implementation. Even when strengthened with empirical commitments intended to render it testable, the hypothesis remains ontologically underdetermined: detectable implementation is not equivalent to demonstrable provenance. Accordingly, the simulation hypothesis, far from being a cosmological thesis, functions as a limit-case of self-referential epistemology — a modern restatement of the logical horizon beyond which no system can verify the reality of its own foundations.
Comments
<<< Back